Academic article how many words

Viewpoint articles would generally have a less formal character than journal articles. The scholarly apparatus of research articles need not be applied so rigorously: polemic could have a place, there might be less need for careful nuance or qualification, or for comprehensiveness of coverage, footnoting could be light, and style could be more individual. Viewpoint pieces could be flexible in form. Two people or more might wish to collaborate on an exchange of views. We think the difference between such exchanges and our Debates would be that they would not focus on one article.

We are flexible in relation to length, as noted above, but our preference is for Viewpoint pieces which are shorter than articles so that they stand apart. As noted above, Viewpoints might also take the form of a collection of shorter pieces addressing a particular conceptual, historiographical or methodological problem, theme or topic.

Organisers of such a collection of shorter viewpoints should endeavour to ensure that the set has conceptual and intellectual coherence. We encourage contributors to such conversations to read each other's works and we expect the viewpoints to be prefaced by an introduction that draws out the key points and provides a suitable frame of reference for reading them. As with other articles, it is important that Review Articles appeal and are accessible to the non-specialist as well as the specialist.

We prefer Review Articles which supply a view of the state of the field as well as a review of the specific works in question. Articles should be submitted according to the instructions for online manuscript submission. We can exceptionally consider for publication articles in some western European languages, but prospective authors must in that case contact the Editors in advance. A condition of acceptance of an article so submitted would be that the article be translated into English — and vetted by a native English speaker for fluency and idiom.

Authors must never multi-submit! All journals frown on this practice. Notes should not be used for 'sub-texts'. Wherever possible without confusion, references should be grouped together. It is the author's responsibility to provide high-definition images of any illustrations they wish to include good-quality prints if hard copy; jpgs etc. All figures submitted to the journal in colour will be published in colour online at no cost. You will be asked to specify if you would like to pay for print colour when you submit your article via ScholarOne.

Colour figures must have a resolution of at least dots per inch at their final size. It is the author's responsibility also to obtain any necessary permissions and to provide us with copies of the relevant documentation.

For guidance on this, please contact the Oxford University Press Rights department. Please note the relatively small page-size of Past and Present max. The Journal encourages the publication of constructive Debates on controversial topics and on controversial points made in the course of articles which it has published.

The 'accepted' version is the final draft author manuscript, as accepted for publication, including modifications based on referees' suggestions but before it has undergone copy-editing and proof correction. Before you deposit your article, please refer to our more detailed guidelines. We also offer authors the option of paying an APC article processing charge to publish their work freely online immediately on publication.

Decisions regarding each submission will be taken without exception by the Academic Editor s , guaranteeing the excellence and high standard of our decision-making process.

The Academic Editor s may decide between the following options:. In order to guarantee swiftness of the editorial process, each manuscript will only be allowed two rounds of review and revisions.

Authors are thus urged to address all issues raised by the reviewers directly after the first round of peer-review. Copyediting After the manuscript is accepted for publication it will undergo a first stage of copy editing where the Editorial staff will correct any minor mistakes such as punctuation or references and check that all necessary information regarding the manuscript and authors has been provided.

Authors will receive an edited version of their manuscript for author copy editing after acceptance of the manuscript for publication. This is the last stage where any substantial copy editing changes to the text are allowed the next stage—proofreading—is restricted to correcting typographical and layout errors. Authors should carefully check the proofs for typographical or layout errors, and use the sticky notes tool to mark and explain any changes necessary.

Publication After the final proofread manuscript has been received and the last corrections have been performed the manuscript will be published. The manuscript will be published in the thematic issue, and the author will be promptly informed as soon as the article is available online. In some cases, the publication may be delayed in order to guarantee that all articles are published simultaneously. Publication Fees Original submissions must have a maximum length of 6, words.

The article processing charge for each manuscript accepted for publication after peer-review is as follows:. Note: The word count includes all elements in the document, without exception.

You can use the Word Count dialog box in your software to know the number of words in the document. As an open access publisher, Cogitatio is committed to ensuring permanent and universal free access to all published articles, unlike closed-access journals which limit their readership to those able to pay subscription fees.

As publishing is not without its costs, the journal needs to offset all production costs through article processing charges. These charges are used to finance the whole publication and archiving process, including peer review, editing, proof-reading and copy-editing, and hosting and maintenance of the journal archives. Without proper financing for such necessary expenses, the journal would be unable to provide the rigorous and professional service upon which we pride ourselves.

Numerous universities and funding agencies allocate funds to cover article processing charges, and authors are advised to check with their departments and libraries if funds are available to cover open access publication costs. Authors affiliated with institutions that have joined Cogitatio's Membership Program can publish their articles totally free of charge.

Authors who demonstrate financial need and cannot afford the article processing charge can apply for a waiver during the abstract submission procedure waiver requests during or after peer-review will not be considered. Requests will be assessed on a case-by-case basis and may be granted in cases of genuine need.

Due to the numerous costs associated with open access publishing, Cogitatio can only accept to process a limited number of waived submissions per issue. Institutional Memberships Institutional Membership is destined for institutions, groups and societies that wish to cover the whole cost of open access publishing and allow their authors to freely publish and disseminate their articles to a broader readership.

Cogitatio offers two different types of Institutional Membership:. For a membership quote please contact us at membership cogitatiopress. The journal is currently indexed in the following databases:. Powered by. Instructions for Authors Conditions for Manuscript Submission A manuscript can only be accepted for consideration if: 1. Type of Manuscripts The journal accepts the following types of articles for publication all must be original and can not have been published elsewhere : Article: a paper containing original research results that has not been published elsewhere.

View by community or topic. Library Connect. Societies' Update. Healthcare Professionals. This article is the third in the series. Previous articles were: Six things to do before writing your manuscript 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously Four steps to preparing your first draft Here is the process I use: Think about the topic you want to present, for some days or weeks.

Make figures and tables. Then write as quickly as possible, as if thinking out loud. Get everything down, ignoring spelling, grammar, style and troublesome words. Correct and rewrite only when the whole text is on paper.

Polishing your manuscript Use good English Unfortunately for non-native English speakers, language is an important problem. Look at this complaint from an editor: This paper fell well below my threshold. I refuse to spend time trying to understand what the author is trying to say.

Besides, I really want to send a message that they can't submit garbage to us and expect us to fix it. My rule of thumb is that if there are more than 6 grammatical errors in the abstract, then I don't waste my time carefully reading the rest. Avoid these common problems: Sentences that don't follow each other logically Sentences that are difficult to understand by non-initiated readers e. Long sentences do not make the writing more professional; they only confuse readers.

Nowadays, the average length of sentences in scientific writing is about 12 to 17 words. It is said that we read one sentence in one breath. Long sentences choke readers.

After the reviewers recommended using shorter sentences, I modified it to the following: … Conversely, applying M-AMBI the explained variability reaches until The mismatch in the comparison of both methods in terms of degraded-undegraded equivalences was of Length of the manuscript Again, look at the journal's Guide for Authors, but an ideal length for a manuscript is 25 to 40 pages, double spaced, including essential data only.

This is related to the high concentration of organic matter. Although it was…" Excessive use of subordinate clauses in one sentence e. Phrases without meaning. Learn from the following comments from an Editor: "Never say 'and references therein. You start the conclusions "In this paper, we have prepared The samples were prepared in the laboratory! Repetitive words with similar meanings, such as "schematic diagram," "research work," etc.